refactor(theme): [divider] refactor divider theme vars #2238
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve a transition in the styling of the divider component within the theme package. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme/src/divider/vars.less (1)
2-2: Consider translating comments to English for consistency.The current comments are in Chinese. To improve maintainability and ensure consistency across the codebase, consider translating these comments to English. This would make the code more accessible to a wider range of developers.
Here's a suggested translation:
// Dividing line color --tv-Divider-dividing-line: var(--tv-color-border-divider-short); // Text background color --tv-Divider-text-bg-color: var(--tv-color-border-divider); // Text color --tv-Divider-text-color: var(--tv-color-text);Also applies to: 4-4, 6-6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/theme/src/divider/index.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/divider/vars.less (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/theme/src/divider/vars.less (2)
1-1: Approve the function name change and refactoring approach.The change from
.component-css-vars-divider()to.inject-Divider-vars()aligns with a more descriptive and consistent naming convention. This refactoring improves code readability and maintains a standardized approach across components.
3-7: Approve the variable changes and verify their usage.The changes to the CSS variables look good:
--tv-Divider-dividing-linenow usesvar(--tv-color-border-divider-short).--tv-Divider-text-bg-colornow usesvar(--tv-color-border-divider).--tv-Divider-text-colornow usesvar(--tv-color-text).These changes appear to be part of a larger effort to standardize variable naming and improve theme consistency.
To ensure these changes are applied consistently, please run the following script to check for any remaining occurrences of the old variable names:
✅ Verification successful
CSS Variable Changes Verified Successfully.
All old variable names have been removed, and new variable names are consistently used across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of old variable names # Test: Search for old variable names. Expect: No results. rg --type less '\-\-ti-divider-(dividing-line|text-bg-color|text-color)' # Test: Verify new variable usage. Expect: Occurrences in other files using these variables. rg --type less '\-\-tv-Divider-(dividing-line|text-bg-color|text-color)'Length of output: 806
packages/theme/src/divider/index.less (3)
13-13: LGTM! Consistent variable renaming.The CSS variable renaming from
--ti-divider-dividing-lineto--tv-Divider-dividing-lineis consistent with the new naming convention and maintains functionality.
22-22: LGTM for consistency. Question about removed opacity.The CSS variable renaming is consistent with the previous change. However, it appears that an opacity property has been removed.
Can you confirm if removing the opacity was intentional and doesn't affect the visual appearance of the divider? If it was unintentional, consider re-adding it:
- border-left: 1px solid var(--tv-Divider-dividing-line); + border-left: 1px solid var(--tv-Divider-dividing-line); + opacity: var(--tv-Divider-opacity, 1);Let's check if opacity is defined elsewhere:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for opacity definitions in divider-related files echo "Searching for opacity in divider-related files:" rg -i 'opacity' packages/theme/src/divider
29-30: LGTM! Consistent variable renaming for text and background colors.The renaming of color variables is consistent with the new naming convention and maintains functionality.
Let's verify that these new variables are properly defined:
✅ Verification successful
Verified Variable Definitions
The new color variables
--tv-Divider-text-colorand--tv-Divider-text-bg-colorare properly defined invars.lessand used correctly inindex.less.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for definitions of the new color variables echo "Searching for new color variable definitions:" rg -i '(--tv-Divider-text-color|--tv-Divider-text-bg-color)' packages/theme/src/dividerLength of output: 547
| @@ -4,14 +4,13 @@ | |||
| @divider-prefix-cls: ~'@{css-prefix}divider'; | |||
|
|
|||
| .@{divider-prefix-cls} { | |||
| .component-css-vars-divider(); | |||
| .inject-Divider-vars(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Mixin naming inconsistency detected across components
Multiple .less files are still using the old mixin pattern component-css-vars-*, while others have adopted the new inject-*vars(). To ensure uniformity and maintainable styling practices, please update the remaining files to use the new mixin pattern.
Files still using old mixin pattern:
- packages/theme/src/notify/vars.less
- packages/theme/src/wizard/vars.less
- packages/theme/src/upload/vars.less
- packages/theme/src/transfer/vars.less
- packages/theme/src/tooltip/vars.less
- packages/theme/src/tree/index.less
- packages/theme/src/textarea/index.less
- packages/theme/src/table/index.less
- packages/theme/src/tabs/index.less
- packages/theme/src/steps/index.less
- packages/theme/src/slider/index.less
- packages/theme/src/statistic/index.less
- packages/theme/src/select/index.less
- packages/theme/src/scrollbar/index.less
- packages/theme/src/popover/index.less
- packages/theme/src/popconfirm/index.less
- packages/theme/src/picker/index.less
- packages/theme/src/pager/index.less
- packages/theme/src/modal/index.less
- packages/theme/src/popeditor/index.less
- packages/theme/src/milestone/index.less
- packages/theme/src/loading/index.less
- packages/theme/src/link/index.less
- packages/theme/src/base-select/index.less
- packages/theme/src/autocomplete/index.less
- packages/theme/src/card-group/index.less
- packages/theme/src/alert/index.less
- packages/theme/src/badge/index.less
- packages/theme/src/dropdown/index.less
- packages/theme/src/drawer/index.less
- packages/theme/src/crop/index.less
- packages/theme/src/cascader/index.less
- packages/theme/src/carousel/index.less
- packages/theme/src/calendar/index.less
- packages/theme/src/card/index.less
- packages/theme/src/radio/index.less
- packages/theme/src/radio-group/index.less
- packages/theme/src/progress/index.less
- packages/theme/src/numeric/index.less
- packages/theme/src/radio-button/index.less
- packages/theme/src/ip-address/index.less
- packages/theme/src/guide/index.less
- packages/theme/src/dept/index.less
- packages/theme/src/dialog-box/index.less
- packages/theme/src/collapse/index.less
- packages/theme/src/collapse-item/index.less
- packages/theme/src/checkbox-group/index.less
- packages/theme/src/checkbox/index.less
- packages/theme/src/checkbox-button/index.less
- packages/theme/src/breadcrumb/index.less
- packages/theme/src/bulletin-board/index.less
- packages/theme/src/button/index.less
- packages/theme/src/amount/index.less
- packages/theme/src/anchor/index.less
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider verifying consistency across components.
The change from component-css-vars-divider() to inject-Divider-vars() aligns with the PR objective and follows a more consistent naming convention. This is a good refactoring step.
To ensure consistency, let's check if similar changes have been made in other component files:
There was an error executing the previous script. Here's a corrected version to verify mixin consistency across components:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar mixin changes in other component files
# Search for both old and new mixin patterns in all .less files
echo "Files still using old mixin pattern:"
rg -t less 'component-css-vars-\w+\(\)' packages/theme/src
echo "\nFiles using new mixin pattern:"
rg -t less 'inject-\w+-vars\(\)' packages/theme/src
Length of output: 403
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar mixin changes in other component files
# Search for the old mixin pattern
echo "Files still using old mixin pattern:"
rg -t less 'component-css-vars-\w+\(\)' packages/theme/src
# Search for the new mixin pattern
echo -e "\nFiles using new mixin pattern:"
rg -t less 'inject-\w+-vars\(\)' packages/theme/src
Length of output: 11286
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation